Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-23: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks also for attending useful
discussion throughout the progress of the document, I think informational
status probably the right thing to do.

I have some comments, those I think when addressed with improve the document
more -

1. Section 4: I see no need to change UE = User equipment to UE = User endpoint.

2. I didn't find scalability as a motivating point in the section 3 in clear
text, however, found the enhanced mode to solve the scalability issue later.
This happens without educating us about the scalability issue that the mobile
network has. I think it would be great if this informational specification also
inform about the existing issues regarding scalability the current network
architecture has.

3. hmm, how any modes we are really defining here ? we are defining traditional
and enhanced mode, and then section 5.4 is also defining another one.. this is
confusing. We should clearly say there are three modes in the beginning if we
have 3 modes. However, I actually don't think 5.4 defines another mode, rather
it is a combined arrangement of traditional and enhanced mode, so it should be
call it that way or another mechanism of enhanced inter-working.



_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to