As stated in the abstract, this document does not change the 3GPP
architecture nor does it propose changes in signalling protocols defined
by 3GPP. The authors explicitly state that this document describes an
*implementation* based on existing 3GPP specifications.
The stated goal is to bring this work to 3GPP for further discussions,
but 3GPP does not deal with implementation-specific matters. If there
are no new interfaces and no new protocols, then there is nothing for
3GPP to consider.
For 5G, that ship has already sailed - operators and vendors are already
deploying solutions so it is unlikely that this document will have any
effect on 5G networks.
For 6G, it is premature to assume that the 5G functional models and
protocol stacks will be carried forward into 6G. Nothing in this
document appears to address issues that other research is attempting to
resolve.
Personally, I have no objection to this document being "adopted" as a WG
draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-not-a-draft/), but
I would have serious objections to further progression towards an RFC.
If the goal of this document is simply to publicise an implementation,
there are other venues where it may get more attention (e.g. arXiv, IEEE
Access).
Cheers ...
/bill
On 2023-10-19 5:41 a.m., Satoru Matsushima wrote:
Dear DMMers,
This email starts a two-weeks DMM WG adoption poll (2) for ""Mobile User
Plane Evolution" - draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution-06.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution/>
Please review the draft and post any comments on this mail thread prior
to Friday, November 3rd, 2023.
Regards,
Sri, Satoru
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
