Support as co-author.Not aware of any IPR that has not been previously disclosed. Support as co-author.
I don't have knowledge of any other IPRs related to this work other than what's been disclosed already.
-- Uma C. On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 5:09 AM Satoru Matsushima via Datatracker < [email protected]> wrote:
Subject: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-22 (Ends 2025-10-30)
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for this document.
Abstract:
Network slicing in 5G enables logical networks for communication
services of multiple 5G customers to be multiplexed over the same
infrastructure. While 5G slicing covers logical separation of
various aspects of 5G infrastructure and services, user's data plane
packets over the Radio Access Network (RAN) and Core Network (5GC)
use IP in many segments of an end-to-end 5G slice. When end-to-end
slices in a 5G System use network resources, they are mapped to
corresponding IP transport network slice(s) which in turn provide the
bandwidth, latency, isolation, and other criteria required for the
realization of a 5G slice.
This document describes mapping of 5G slices to transport network
slices using UDP source port number of the GTP-U bearer when the IP
transport network (slice provider) is separated by an "attachment
circuit" from the networks in which the 5G network functions are
deployed, for example, 5G functions that are distributed across data
centers. The slice mapping defined here is supported transparently
when a 5G user device moves across 5G attachment points and session
anchors.
File can be retrieved from:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-tn-aware-mobility/
Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected]
in copy. Objections should be motivated and suggestions to resolve them are
highly appreciated.
Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded again of the
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79
[1]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of
any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can
be found at [3].
Thank you.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
|
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
