I like it. The first half (having the "forced" 2step pattern programming for the drums) is a little more interesting to me sonically because of the pause that is implied by the drum pattern, and also because of how the "melody" (synthesis) sounds fall at that pause point... Has a bit more sinister and "dubby" feel.
Nice time stretch transistion. I also like the second half with the typical 2 step drum pattern - allbeit - you hear that pattern all the time - it's because it works to set the groove and that's just what is does here. Nice work on the layers of sound being upfront and then far away from use of filters, levels, and FX. Solid tune - lets just hear the finished 5+ miniute tune though :] I struggle with the same problems also when I start any song: which pattern will best anchor/fit any tune? (making that choice right now actually). Essentially though - you have the beginnings of 2 solid tunes that are very similar but not the same... Write one with the forced 2 step pattern and write a second with the same kit using a normal 2 step pattern. I'm constantly having to tell myself - save that idea (that comes into a song that changes the direction of what I started with) for the NEXT song. Mike ---> MK2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.madbass.com on 8/17/02 11:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://www.treyharrison.com/mp3/quickstep1.mp3 > > its kinda split into 2 parts, i'm curious to see if people have a preference > for one over the other... > > t > > > > > > --- > Drum&Bass Arena Producers Discussion List http://www.breakbeat.co.uk > You are currently subscribed to dnb-prod as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Drum&Bass Arena Producers Discussion List http://www.breakbeat.co.uk You are currently subscribed to dnb-prod as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
