Can we make some option with a "ban this user" link at the bottom of emails, and when enough listusers click the link, a message is flagged for review?
On 11 February 2015 at 20:41, Usspookes Lovesystemd < [email protected]> wrote: > Nothing is completely secure, there is always a way in: computers do > what you tell them to do. > Security exists in layers. > What bastille does is all those basic linux-security setup things that > you may FORGET to do otherwise. > > Yes you also have to patch and compile the kernel with grsecurity. > Yes you also have to disable things like firewire in the kernel. > Yes you also have to make sure you're running nothing extranious. > > BUT BASTILLE does have a place. It closes the "traditional" unix fuckups. > So you can concentrate on the new security fuckups without getting bitten > because of some basic thing you forgot! > > This is BULLSHIT that you fucking faggots say that Bastille is useless > because > 1) you ALLWAYS remeber to do all the little things it configures. > and > 2) HIRE ME TO DO IT FOR YOU. > > FUCK YOU > FUCK YOU! > > Guess what, Bastille gets that "general case security solution" slightly > closer. > It also educates people as to what options exist on linux and what they do. > > Obviously you, ASSHOLE, have never looked at it. You FUCK. > > FUCK YOU! > > With people like you security, even the smallest amount, is IMPOSSIBLE, > because > you REFUSE to package/allow in scripts that do the setup, because you have > a > CONFLICT OF INTEREST. You want no one to learn and you want to be hired. > > Thus you, in your corrupt way, block things that make security ever so > slighthly more > straightforward on Linux. You're making work for yourself. Kinda like > systemd > and their consultation services: they cause the problem, now they'll fix > it. > > I have used bastille as a starting point ever since 2002 or so. > It is a very useful script for running when you first install a Linux > system. > (Then I continue to do what else is needed, it is a good base however, this > way you don't forget to do things it does) > > You are shitsucking scum in that you won't have Bastille for Devuan. It > shows EXACTLY > what you people are: rentseekers. You want your cut for each install (as > security expert) FUCK YOU. > > --- [email protected] wrote: > > From: "Jack L. Frost" <[email protected]> > To: Roy Nielsen <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dng] Please!! revive Bastille hardening tool for Devuan > Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:13:42 +0300 > > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:10:27AM -0700, Roy Nielsen wrote: > > I don't believe the task is impossible, I'm sure there are people > > working on such a tool and perhaps they will even open source it! > > > > Regards, > > -Roy > > As an industry specialist dealing with security even as a non-infosec guy, > I'm > confident in saying that a general case security solution is highly > improbable. > But hey, improbable things happen all the time. I have this bridge I'm > trying > to sell... > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > > > > > _____________________________________________________________ > The Free Email with so much more! > =====> http://www.MuchoMail.com <===== > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
