On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 22:18:41 -0300 hellekin <helle...@dyne.org> wrote:
> On 03/09/15 19:26, Christopher Barry wrote: > > > > these democratic ideas. Unfortunately, just like in real government, > > special interests can stack the deck (e.g. dominate committees) and > > push things that are self serving and maybe not in the best > > interests of the greater community. > > > *** Welcome Christopher! > > I agree with you that Devuan governance needs to differ from Debian's, > and that is must consider the general interest as well as respect the > particular. LOL, I think it would be mighty difficult to duplicate Debian's governance. I think doing so would require years of smugly satisfied ossification. Judging from this mailing list, as well as #devuan and #debianfork, I'd say we're as far from Debian's governance as conceivable. > > Given the amount of speculation around what Devuan is and how it will > evolve, I'd rather give it a chance to actually get there before we > can start a discussion from a solid ground, rather than get to speak > about the shadow of aliens, and how your vision is necessarily > inferior to mine, because mine was raised by true Trolls that turn > into stone when they meditate, etc. Pre-cisely. We don't know our best governance yet. Also, if we don't deliver a distro, all the rest is a moot point. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
