On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 10:36:56PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > I simply think that at the moment energies could be spent in a more > productive way than in trying to identify all the good technical > aspects of systemd (which might indeed be numerous). We still don't > have a systemd-free distribution, so I am sorry but I don't see the > point of discussing about which aspect of systemd one would like to > have in an otherwise systemd-free distribution <snip>
To know the next project we need. And to figure out how much of it needs to be a dropin ABI-compatible replacement, how much should be conceptually similar, where we can reuse something else, and how much serves as a warning to all comers not to go that way. We need to understand the strengths and caveats, the failings and the bright spots. Thanks, Isaac Dunham _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
