> > That's pretty arrogant. Can you back that up with some actual reasons, > like > > others in this discussion are doing? Or is this simply a case of > "because I > > said so" > > > > It's not arrogant, it's a fact. There's not even a single release, only > a dozen or so regular participants, and you already want to detach > developers from users? You're proposing to solve a problem that does > not exist yet. People used to mailing lists use filters when they're > annoyed with the traffic. >
I am neither the first, nor will I be the last, to ask for a -dev list. > *** I see another two groups: people who want to work together and build > something different that won't end up in an isolated technical committee > in their ivory towers, and bullies. > I don't see anything mentioned about technical committees or ivory towers. Bullies, seriously? You know what hellekin - you post from a dyne.org email address, and from the way you write you put yourself forward as one of the people running the project. Frankly, I am really not all that happy with your attitude, and as you represent dyne.org, I have no option but to assume this to be representative of the project leads in general. So far, quite a few people with: or interesting; or no-noise; or informative opinions; have left the list because of the lack of a -dev list, or a basic "we don't like your type around here" sentiment that lead them to think "fuck it, this is a waste of time". You can now count me amongst those in the "fuck it, this is a waste of time" camp. Good luck with your forum, your "everyone use one list or GTFO" attitude, the constant off-list clique forming and gossipy emails about list members off-list and best of luck to Devuan. I'll be decommissioning the Jenkins slave I contributed, and will go get some work done.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng