David Harrison wrote:
On 05/05/2015 20:43, [email protected] wrote:
Well, the problem here is that systemd is*not* hot-pluggable, at all,
as we have recently learned the hard way.
Here's a thought. Thrown to the list with no requisite knowledge to
back it up, so please don't bite!
Is there any way of building a package or some other installable to
create a sandboxed/containerised/quarantined/VM'd minimal systemd?
That's if minimal isn't a contradiction in terms where systemd's
concerned? Just complete enough for a user to install and use
contaminatedware within it, when they really have no other choice, but
designed not to leak out and infect their otherwise clean system?
As others have alluded: If you absolutely, positively have to run
something that depends on systemd,
- run your base system without systemd
- run your systemd-dependent code in a container or a virtual machine w/
systemd
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
