On 17/05/15 14:55, Jaret Cantu wrote:
On 05/17/2015 09:20 AM, David Hare wrote:
The problem is: installing "eudev" in init.d because it provides
"udev" which already exists. Installing the dummy udev (needed to
satisfy deps of other packages) does not remove existing conffiles.
At least, with the way I did it, which I'm not saying is necessarily
the best.
I certainly know my way isn't the best: laziness~!
I looked into finding a way to make eudev provide the udev packages
elegantly and instead went with the stupid approach of "Everything eudev
now!" I mean, there is no such thing as libeudev, right?
Everything is still just named udev, after all, so I can justify my
sloth at least a little.
Here, every package is named "eudev". (except the dummies).. set your
debian/ like mine and "libeudev1" gets built along with a dummy
libudev1. Same goes for libgeudev-1.0-0 et al.
Hmm, looking at the "init" package, a "Pre-Depends: eudev |
systemd-udev" in a udev dummy package is probably the way to go. Or
maybe that only works for sysvinit since its conffiles are in a separate
package.
That failed (my build) because "eudev" itself depends on the dummy udev
(because the initscript problem).
Here's some food for thought: https://wiki.debian.org/ConfigPackages
Too little sleep and too little coffee to worry about this right now.
Devuan didn't happen to defect any legit former Debian maintainers who
are a bit better with this sort of arcana, did it?
We can do it without them! Nearly there.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
