KatolaZ <kato...@freaknet.org> escribió:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:57:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote:An LTS branch isn't needed if you do version controlled releases and sponsor support for versioned releases for at least 3-4 versions back.[cut]As releases mature, 1.0 would be maintained until the fourth or fifth release year following, then pastured, regardless of version number. The only time the main number should be changed is IF and ONLY IF glibc is updated, otherwise 1.0 would transmigrate to 1.1.How does that sound?It sounds like Slackware, and there is a clear reason why I have been using Debian and not Slackware. I believe that the stable-testing-unstable-experimental organisation is working already fine. We can discuss whether we have the possibility (and the resources) to provide long-time support releases, but if you guys want to make a Slackvuan, then don't count me in.
I think the plan is FIVE branches: +experimental (always experimental, packages migrate to development)+development (always development, packages migrate to testing, gets cloned into testing on stable release)
+testing (transforms into stable on release) *stable (transforms into oldstable on release) +oldstable (disappears on release)I think the support given to stable + oldstable is enough for business needs: it may be 2+2 years!
Regards Noel er Envite
binzb2X277udW.bin
Description: Clave PGP pública
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
