"Devuan appears to want to stick to sysvinit for the initial release. Afterwards however, is debatable...."
Yes, thank you for the clarification, maybe I wasn't clear. After the first release was what I meant. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:42 PM, James Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > Devuan appears to want to stick to sysvinit for the initial release. > Afterwards however, is debatable, but regardless, sanity in init is going > to be probably prevalent. > > I too favor OpenRC as well as it is really a sane way to extend sysvinit. > ------------------------------ > From: Antonio Trkdz.tab <[email protected]> > Sent: 7/21/2015 4:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [DNG] openRC > > Dear List, > > I have been following your discussions with a lot of interest for quite a > bit now. > I really admire what you are doing as I really felt let down by Debian's > decision to prevent people to have a choice. > > I am not a programmer and I consider myself an average user, I have been > using Debian for years and I was very happy with it. > I am using Wheezy right now and I am waiting for the stable release of > Devuan to make the switch. > > I used Gentoo in the past and I remember that openRC was very easy to > get used to and appeared to get the job done fairly well and neatly. > Would it be useful to consider to adopt this system for forthcoming > releases of Devuan, since it is a complement of sysvinit? > > This is just an humble thought from a non technical point of view, I > hope you take it for what it is. > > Thank you all for your exceptional work. > > Antoniotrkdz > > P.S.: I am sorry if this question was already made in early > conversations and I missed it. >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
