Le 24/07/2015 04:52, Jude Nelson a écrit :
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:30 PM, T.J. Duchene <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Thursday, July 23, 2015 08:22:55 PM Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:12:01AM +0200, Teodoro Santoni wrote:
> > ... but, yeah, it's outside the scope of Devuan. D-Bus just
sucks and is
> > documented on a random basis, when you compare it to the rest of
> > GNU/Fedora
> > it's... like GTK: it sucks, there are alternatives but it's a
PITA to port
> > away 'cause a lot of big codebases uses them as foundation.
>
> So there are alternatives to GTK: Do any suck less? What are they?
>
What's wrong with GTK? I don't care for it, but it is not any
worse than
Microsoft's UI.
There are lots of alternatives. wxWidgets and Qt are the most common
suggestions, but there are far more esoteric ones. If you are
aiming for
widest portability support, Qt is probably your best bet.
Doesn't wxWidgets use GTK on GNU/Linux?
I don't care for it myself - because it is C++.
Minor correction: GTK is written in C, and relies on GLib, which is
also written C. However, it's open to debate as to how
similar/different C-plus-GLib is to C++ in practice.
Yes, opaque structures are everywhere in Glib, AFAIR. That's the
way to provide encapsulation in C. Some nice features of modern
programming like encapsulation or generic programming do not belong to
OOP, except in C++.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
