Hi, Steve Litt wrote on 29/07/2015 at 06:25 CEST:
[...] Meanwhile, as far as I can see, their entanglement with
> polkit does nothing more than my idea about sudo. > Does anyone see any reason why polkit should be assumed > more secure than sudo?
I don't know about polkit, but sudoers(5) is a mess, and for something else than a quickhack (I know, they last longest!), I would not entrust sudo(8) with a mount(8) invocation before serious consideration. Commandline executables' option surfaces are so convoluted and the programs have so many "features" that, for example, I can not immediately tell if it is possible to launch a shell via invocation of mount(8) or not. > [...] Kind regards, T. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
