On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 20:34:29 +0200 Laurent Bercot <ska-de...@skarnet.org> wrote:
> Oh, I'm not blaming some abstract entity called "su". When I say > that su is not good (anymore), it's obviously on us. > There's a reason why I have written programs performing privilege > gain without bit s executables. ;) > Now let me ask you this Laurent. Your programs performing privilege gain without bit s executables: Did you tie them into the init system? Did you tie them into (not allow them to be called from, but tie them into) lots of other executables? Does the system break if someone replaces your execuables with (almost) equivalents? Didn't think so, and that's the whole point. SteveT Steve Litt August 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng