On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:38:14 -0400 richard white <[email protected]> wrote:
> All, > > A detailed technical treatise of systemd > http://blog.darknedgy.net/technology/2015/10/11/0/ > > -Rich Hi Rich, First, this is the guy who early on made the "uselessd" supposed knockoff of the Init part of systemd, so he knows his technical chops. I pretty much stopped reading after the following line in the composition: ====================================================== Fourthly, I will only be dealing with systemd the service manager (of which the init is an intracomponent subset, and also contains several other internal subsystems and characteristics which will prove of paramount importance to the analysis), and to a lesser extent journald. ====================================================== Here's a quote from one of my posts during the Debian-User systemd wars: ====================================================== If systemd was just a PID1 with the features you enumerate above, I'd be dancing in the street, not looking for a way out. ====================================================== If systemd had been just another init system, replacible by any other init system, I probably would have thought nothing about it. The vast majority of the problem is its complete fencing off of the underlying OS. SteveT _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
