Hi Mark, I put something like that you said in one of my posts: "The Bazaar has become Cathedral"
http://www.linuxito.com/15-miscelaneo/478-el-bazar-se-ha-convertido-en-catedral Maybe freedom of developers it's more important than freedom of code. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Mark Purcell <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > It does feel like this is a moment when we might want to consider whether > the really important distinction is not so much between open-source > software and closed-source software (since that battle does appear to be > trending thoroughly in favor of the former), but between software > developed, distributed, and maintained by corporations, and software > developed, distributed, and maintained by non-corporate groups (whether > those be 'community,' or 'community-based', or popular, or non-profit, or > foundation, or grass-roots, etc. > > Best, > Mark > > > On 11/05/2015 01:48 AM, KatolaZ wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:27:02PM -0500, Steven W. Scott wrote: >> >>> Hmmmm... things are getting clearerer. >>> >>> >>> http://recode.net/2015/11/04/microsoft-and-red-hat-team-up-to-offer-linux-on-azure-cloud/ >>> >>> SWS >>> >> Things have always been very clear, at least to me, since >> 2003-2005. And when I used to say "beware of RedHat" back in the days, >> people just thought I was mad accusing one of the "champions" of the >> OpenSource/FreeSoftware movement. I really hope that this time my guts >> feelings about the final aims of the potterization process will be >> just wrong... >> >> HND >> >> KatolaZ >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
