Le 08/11/2015 19:51, Simon Hobson a écrit :
Didier Kryn <[email protected]> wrote:

Why the hell did they invent suspend-to-disk?
I take it you don't like the idea ?

My only laptop is OS X, and I tend to leave so much open (text files of 
temporary notes, a gazzillion web pages/tabs, mail (home), mail (work), and a 
few others. To boot takes several minutes*, sleep takes a second or two.
But for a while I was using a laptop without a working battery, and then 
suspend to disk was a godsend. Takes a little longer writing 8G to disk and 
reading it in again when waking, but really really made sense for me - and as 
implemented in OS X works very well.
While I now have a working (more or less) battery, it will still suspend to 
disk if the battery is almost down when I sleep it.

As an aside, a lot of years ago with a different hat one, we had a customer who moved around a lot - but 
didn't actually need "portable" use. Laptops weren't common back then, and Apple's 
"portable" cost £4.5k, had a crap display, and was generally descibed by others as 
"luggable" (I've seen smaller batteries on a motorbike !) In the end, he settled on a Mac LC 
(original version, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_LC) with an extra keyboard, mouse, and monitor. 
The computer itself was small enough (just) to go in a briefcase.
Suspend to disk would have been just brilliant for that application.

So personally, I think it's a wonderful idea. If there are problems in some 
implementations, I'd say you should direct your displeasure to the 
implementation rather than the concept.

* As discussed before, the "system" boot time is fairly irrelevant - the system 
isn't usable for my workload for a couple of minutes after the services have loaded. 10 
or 20 seconds either way would be irrelevant.


No. I don't dislike the idea. I admit it is brillant. I also use suspend mode, and my laptop is configured to do it rather quickly when running on battery. I erroneously assumed the fast restart was the only motivation.

However you and me enjoy the fast wake up - you mentionned it :-) Therefore there is no reason to not enjoy the fast boot (and fast shutdown) as well. Maybe you never shutdown, but some, like me, prefer to put their laptop back in a well-know state from time to time.

This leads to the conclusion: boot time doesn't matter if you never shut down, but it matters if you do it often. We might have reached this conclusion earlier :-) but there also has been a discussion on the reality of the gain in boot time.

    Didier

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to