Hi Jude,
I just saw the header:
#include <fskit/fskit.h>
in "fuse/fskit_fuse.h". So 'libfskit-fuse' depens on 'libfskit'.
Thanks,
Aitor.
On 10/11/15 20:43, Jude Nelson wrote:
Hi aitor_czr,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:25 AM, aitor_czr <aitor_...@gnuinos.org
<mailto:aitor_...@gnuinos.org>> wrote:
I uploaded fskit to gitlab:
https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/fskit/tree/gbp-master
That's a very outdated version of fskit. The latest one (the one
consistent with vdev) is in github: https://github.com/jcnelson/fskit
I didn't see the dpkg template in 'contrib/debian'. That blindness !!
Now, i see some significant differences between this template and
mine. In my opinion:
1.- '/usr/lib/libfskit.so' and 'usr/lib/libfskit_fuse.so'
dinamical libraries must be included in the respective
*-dev.install files, instead of 'libfskit.install' and
'libfskit-fuse.install'.
2.- libfskit depends on libfskit-fuse and not the other way
around, because libfskit-fuse is the backend (I did it so in Netman).
Isn't it?
It's the other way around: libfskit-fuse depends on libfskit. But
unless you're packaging vdevfs along with vdevd, you don't need
libfskit at all :)
HTH,
Jude
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
