On Tue, 12/29/15, Jim Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: [DNG] What's "Armstrong"? (was: Fw: Question: eth0 vs enp1s0) To: "dng" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, December 29, 2015, 6:57 PM
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Rainer Weikusat <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve Litt <[email protected]> writes: >> My response is below the original message. I can't respond on >> debian-user, because I have Armstrong Syndrome... > > I've so far learnt that it's "Don Armstrong" who seems to be a Debian > maintainer. But that's surely not a household word in itself. > Steve sited in a previous thread "Our friendly community" that Armstrong fixed it so he(Steve) couldn't post there. I guess you can say he was "strong armed". Steve didn't go into details of why. Jim -------------------------------------------- Ah . . . those were the days. Steve and I were very vocal about our disapproval of Debian adopting systemd on -user. Don Armstrong was (maybe still is) 'the enforcer'. I got at least one warning - maybe more. Steve got the boot . . . His description would undoubtedly be more informative and entertaining than mine. :) golinux _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
