On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:15:28 +0100 shraptor <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is my belief that vdev should go in some testing or development > repo. If there are free capacities on the build infrastructure, it would make testing much more appealing to have an unofficial (pre)alpha or "lab" repository for Jessie. I just don't feel like recompiling short-lived testing stuff on my ancient machines here every few time units, when I know that there are binaries around anyway. Some notes on a possibly necessary migration from the traditional setup and a list of interesting / untested / critical scenarios would be nice, too. Perhaps as "release notes" - that would be very handy in combination with apt-listchanges. BTW, I don't have a fancy setup here, but can offer to play with debs for amd64. Some headless testing on x86, armhf and perhaps armel is possible as well. Florian _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
