Hi, I am not a systemd supporter, what I am, is someone who wants GNU/Linux to retain its flexibility. Systemd's aim appears to be that of limiting differences between Linux machines to a minimum. Such a minimum would not exist with users having the freedom to manage and set up their Linux OS the way they want. I find this limitation a demotivator to use Linux instead of other OSs like OS X and MS Windows.
If I am given the same OS recipe, why should I bother myself to use another OS that mimics what has been available for years? Edward On 21/02/2016, Didier Kryn <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 20/02/2016 21:58, Mitt Green a écrit : >> Edward Bartolo wrote: >> >> >>> >I think systemd is aimed at desktop users assuming that most >>> >Linux users are also desktop users. >> LOL, since when most Linux users are desktop users? >> Linux market share on desktop is around 1-2%, while on >> servers open-source operating systems maintain around 90% >> (count here BSD's also) - different sources, ye know, not >> exact numbers. > > Yet there still might be more Linux desktops than servers. But this > isn't the question. The reality is that the desktop and tablet market, > is the goal of Gnome, KDE and Freedesktop in general. These want to > share the market of Apple. Therefore they just copy the Mac-OS model. > > Didier > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
