Le 14/03/2016 00:07, Daniel Reurich a écrit :
On 14/03/16 11:30, aitor_czr wrote:
>
>On 03/13/2016 10:41 PM, Didier Kryn<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I agree. And I think most people on this list would vote like me
>>for a sequential version number rather than a date. However maybe Jude
>>had the intent to start the numbering when he delivers a first official
>>release. This might be the reason for prefixing with 0. May I suggest
>>using the hash as a minor number and 0 as major?
>>
I'd suggest using a version like:
0.1.jude<date version>+<devuan release starting with 1>
That way when Jude does switch to versioned releases we can assume his
version scheme easily assuming that he starts with > 0.1.
Guys, shouldn't we rename this thread "Packaging Vdev" ?
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
