On 17/03/16 17:32, Jim Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Jaromil <[email protected]> wrote:
dear devuaneers, suckless hackers and friends of simplicity
--- clipped
Basically sup is an hard-coded sudo.
I adopted the software (wrote a mail to pancake, pending response) and
---- clipped the rest
Hi,
As an FYI: "sup" is not a unique name.
sup[1] Software Upgrade Protocol version 20100519-1
There is a name conflict with this package. There doesn't appear
to be any active development[2], but there may be a few users[3].
You can find sup in wheezy, jessie, stretch and sid.
[1] https://packages.debian.org/jessie/sup
[2] https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/sup.html
[3] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=sup
Again, FYI.
Jim
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Would anybody like to do a compare and contrast with 'doas' in OpenBSD?
OpenBSD were so vexed by sudo they ditched it and started from scratch.
I like to 'go with the flow' and so I suggest doas and we port that to
linux unless anybody could find a really good reason why it would be a
bad idea.
Guaranteed free of systemd too!
DaveT
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
