On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 10:22 +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 04:25:20PM -0500, dev wrote: > > > > On 04/15/2016 03:36 PM, Linux O'Beardly wrote: > > > For what it's worth, much of the apt vs aptitude is preference > > > and > > > opinion. However, aptitude does bit better of a job resolving > > > dependencies and preventing them from breaking your system. > > > > Yes, That's what I've always read so I have always used aptitude > > but > > in this instance I have packages that will not upgrade via > > aptitude. > > I mention this case specifically as the Debian docs[1] say > > "aptitude > > is the recommended package manager for Debian". > > > > I might be a bit old-fashioned, but I don't understand anything > besides dpkg, dselect, apt-get, and apt-cache. And I have never felt > the need for anything else...
Me too :D _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
