On 06/06/2016 02:16 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 02:08:27PM +0300, Lars Noodén wrote: >> I've been messing around with building a live image and notice that it >> looks like there are a lot of different mirrors getting called into >> play. I was expecting the same mirrors to be used each time so I could >> populate my local cache on the first try and then use that cache on >> subsequent builds. Is there any efficient way to cache everything I >> access on the first try? I'm using squid3 right now but should I be >> using apt-cacher or apt-cacher-ng instead? > > apt-cacher-ng works a great deal better than squid. It knows about the same > file on different mirrors being supposed to be the same, checksums, rdiff > apt indices, expires files not based on time but on them disappearing from > indices, etc.
Thanks. I notice apt-cacher-ng has some weird dependencies. I don't mind so much that it requires ed, though I think that is unnecessary. I do mind that it wants libsystemd0. What is the right way to report that bug in the package dependency? Regards, Lars _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
