On 07/14/2016 05:56 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting KatolaZ (kato...@freaknet.org):

I personally don't see the reason for such a reaction on your side
Rick (BTW, welcome here :)), but I am sure I am missing something. I
personally believe that all the work to avoid and contain systemd and
other nonsense is valuable, independently of where it comes from :)

I cannot imagine why you would ever think I don't agree!

I can only guess that you didn't bother to attentively read what I said
-- because I think Devuan's work is valuable and have already said so on
my OpenRC conversion page, on the referenced SVLUG mailing list thread,
and on this mailing list.

When you try to pick a fight with someone who admires what you're doing,
just because he doesn't agree with you on every single particular, and
_particularly_ when you attribute to him views he doesn't hold and whose
opposite he just expressed, maybe you should relax a bit and consider
switching to decaf.  ;->

Hi Rick,

I want to give a little bit of constructive criticism.

"A fool is known by a multitude of words." That is not to say you are fool. I don't know you. However, everyone is pretty busy. So if you want to express something accurately, minimize verbiage and refrain from using argumentum ad hominem. I read some of your conversation with Steve on SVLUG. Because it was so long, I didn't read everything. However, from what I did read, to me it you sounded like you had an axe to grind.

That might not the case.

It seems that you are asking: "What is the reason for Devuan when the same thing can be accomplished in a simpler way?" I will try to answer that from my experience.

I personally really appreciate what the people working on Devuan are doing - even if I can do it exactly the same way with pinning.

I have built my own systems and later was a Gentoo fan. I needed some cutting edge features that even Debian testing did not have. Debian was refined and tried and proven. It was wonderful for servers along with BSD. Do you remember those days? I respected their conservatism.

It seems to me Debian leaders want Debian to be the new shinny. This is even before systemd existed. The leaders at Debian could have continued to be leaders. Instead they became followers.

That is why I am thankful for Devuan and it's community.

By talking so much about this and that and wasting people's time, I winder if you have an agenda to push.

So here is a disclaimer for you:

Perhaps something like systemd is a great idea for certain users on mobile devices, etc. However, the way it's being created is questionable.

I am not looking for an answer to this email. I hope it helps you understand one of possibly many (ex)Debian users.

Kind regards,

Simon
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to