On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:01:04AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Rainer Weikusat ([email protected]): > > > Rick Moen <[email protected]> writes: > > > Quoting Rainer Weikusat ([email protected]): > > > > > >> To re-iterate this: > > > > > > [more very strangely worded, difficult-to-parse prose, seemingly alleging > > > that library libsystemd0 can be used to insert 'calls' into unrelated > > > applications -- which assertion in my view does not seem correct, if I > > > am parsing this odd claim correctly] > > > > > >> I honestly understand why stating this as it is causes hostile > > >> reactions. > > > > > > I cannot recall having said anything hostile to you, > > > > Replacing > > > > Because of libsystemd, a systemd sub-project, technically > > gratuitious calls to systemd-specific functions > > can be inserted into unrelated applications. [as it provides the > > required symbols] > > > > with > > > > libsystemd can be used to insert 'calls' into unrelated > > applications > > > > won't win you any prices for objectivity. > > > > But this kind of 'discussion' is as tiresome as it is useless. > > Rainer, I did not, and do not, understand how the mere presence of > libsystemd0 can insert 'calls to systemd-specific functions' > into related applications.
Once again, it is a matter of trust, not technical content. Do you trust the maintainers of libsystemd0 not to entangle it with unwanted systemd-isms? You evidently do. Rainer does not. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
