On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 07:59:16PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
That's exactly why I like Modula 3. You use structured code where that's good. You use objects and inheritance where that's good. You use interaes and modules where that's good. And all those are separate concepts that can be used independently. If you want an object to be an opaque module, you make a module and put the objec in it. And so forth. Except for its Pascal-like wordiness, it's great.
What about D? <https://dlang.org> Apart from the fact that all the compilers are either Windows-oriented or horribly out-of-date, and the actual implementation is a nightmare, and it only allows inline assembly in x86, the core language seemed like a good idea. Seriously, if only the language didn't come with so much baggage, it would probably be awesome. -- _____________________________________________________________________ ( People tend to make rules for others and exceptions for themselves. ) --------------------------------------------------------------------- o ^__^ o (--)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || ||
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
