On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 01:22:25PM -0400, Brian Nash wrote: > I'm not sure on the specifics of the change, but for most scripted uses > you would probably pass it the `-1` flag anyway. > > If it doesn't list one file per line anymore, that could be quite > serious: we would need to use `dir` instead of `ls`! > That's a whole extra keystroke! > > If the changes turn out to be serious, you might want to try > suckless.org's version. (I believe it is called "sutils" and "putils", I > can confirm that they work.)
No. The way you use ls in scripts is you don't. http://mywiki.wooledge.org/ParsingLs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
