On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:55:49PM +0000, Go Linux wrote: > On Fri, 8/19/16, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > Subject: Re: [DNG] Distrowatch Devuan poll do-over > To: dng@lists.dyne.org > Date: Friday, August 19, 2016, 2:13 AM > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 01:21:24AM +0000, Go Linux wrote: > > >> The Distrowatch poll posted by Jim Murphy a few days ago - > >> https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20160816.141551.cded4448.en.html - > >> went sideways this morning. It was archived with results from another > >> unrelated poll. I emailed to let them know and suddenly the odometer was > >> back to zero and there were about 15 votes. So looks like they managed to > >> 'lose' the original data. > >> > >> Time to go click again: > >> > >> http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20160815#poll > >> > >> Polls may not be important but still . . . > > > > > > What's the point of a poll that's stuffed with votes from one side? > > > -------------------------------------------- > > What's the point of any poll or election? I imagine that would depend > whether you agree with those doing the 'stuffing'. ;) Why shouldn't it be > those of us supporting Devuan?
That poll asks whether Devuan is ready. It also asks separate questions of those using and not using Devuan. It does look as if it is properly structured. Go look and decide yourself. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
