On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:26:49 +0200 Svante Signell <svante.sign...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 09:32 -0500, Jim Murphy wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Steve Litt > > <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > > > > > Any opinions on which to choose? > > Don't know if this would make any difference to you or not, but the > > Linux kernel is released under the GPLv2 only license(AFAICT). I > > remember there being quite a bit of debate about this when the > > GPLv3 license was coming out. I personally don't know much > > about Expat, so I won't offer any opinion on it. > > > > The scripts I write I use GPLv2 only. "I" can change it later if I > > need to. > > If you don't write any code directly related to (to be included in) > the GNU/Linux kernel, which unfortunately is GPLv2 only, can you > please consider using GPLv3+ (or at least GPLv2+) for future > contributions? Yes. I'm now considering GPLv3-only. I would *never* consider GPLvAnything+, because I would never agree to anything I haven't yet seen. I have no way of knowing who will be in charge of the FSF in ten or twenty years, or from whom they will be taking money. Once upon a time, Redhat was a best of breed Free Software citizen. Once upon a time, Debian was more trusted than Walter Cronkite. Things change. SteveT Steve Litt August 2016 featured book: Manager's Guide to Technical Troubleshooting Brand new, second edition http://www.troubleshooters.com/mgr _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng