On 08/11/16 23:05, hellekin wrote: > On 11/06/2016 02:59 PM, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > P.S.: in the meantime I edited the web site to remove mention of > devuan-discuss to avoid confusion. But I'd rather do the opposite, and > freeze DNG.
I agree with with you. DNG sounded to me like a temporary thing and I considered devuan-discuss as being more like debian-user, but for Devuan (specifically) and hopefully not moderated to stifle discussion and [fraudulently] hide the facts of systemd displeasure from the masses. The fact that devuan-discuss was not active was a real disappointment to me and I wondered if I had jumped ship to the wrong alternative. I too, most certainly think that going forward, then DNG list should be abandoned in favour of Devuan specific lists. Kind Regards AndrewM
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
