Il 18/04/2017 23:10, Alessandro Selli ha scritto: > On 18/04/2017 at 19:01, KatolaZ wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 06:48:31PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: >> >> [cut] >> >>>> There is really no other reasonable alternative, IMVHO. >>> Yes, there is. It's called a good compromise. Then, outside of it, >>> you find the purists and the extremists. >>> >> We have seen what an irresistible avalanche of compromises has created >> in the systemd camp. > Today I read someone (perhaps Enrico Weigelt) stating that one of > systemd's > pitfalls is wanting to be the perfect init.
Found it, it was Steve Litt instead: «There's no need to search for the perfect init or supervisor. Long ago we got a bunch of them that are all good enough, and can be combined to fill almost any need. This continuing search for a perfect init is just wheel spinning, or perhaps an excuse for profit-driven complexification.» -- Alessandro Selli <alessandrose...@linux.com> Tel. 3701355486 VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net Chiave PGP/GPG key: B7FD89FD _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
