Le 19/04/2017 à 13:36, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 13:23:03 +0200, Alessandro wrote in message
<e6de721c-d85d-4a26-f10d-4d3d3d1a1...@linux.com>:
... I was also been ironic on Aspo, as many times he can
only counter another person's ideas asking "What if <something>
cannot be trusted?", as if this constitutes a valid argument against
..."anything new that cannot fail", such as airport security,
airliner safety, anti-missile defense, ballot machines, etc...
..if you wanna push some new kinda bling, you must be able to
credibly answer such timeless and priceless questions... ;o)
These are serious concerns which involve various aspects of security.
If you need a response of your system within a given delay and
with high security, then I think you should avoid any OS at all and
rather program FPGAs.
In several cases you mentionned, like ballot, crashing the system
is not a big deal; which matters is to not deliver a wrong result.
Better crash than give a wrong result.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
