I have largely stayed quiet about this topic, but why not use waterfox instead of firefox or palemoon?
He makes good changes to it removing a lot of unneeded crap. Although, eme is still an option, most of the junk is removed. That's my thoughts on this though. and that's easy to disable. :) On 07/07/2017 09:10 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 170706-13:13+0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: >> Ooops. Sorry about the previous subject line, finger slipped. >> >> Hi there, >> >> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Miroslav Rovis wrote: >> >>> ... I'm currently without a GUI browser, because of: >>> Building Pale Moon on Devuan fails - Pale Moon forum >>> https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=15751 >> Pale Moon has been my browser of choice for quite a while, it's >> running under fvwm95 and Devuan. I just installed the binary. > Binary is fine for regular installs... See below. >> laptop3:~$ >>> cat /etc/devuan_version >> jessie >> laptop3:~$ >>> uname -a >> Linux laptop3 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u2 (2017-06-26) >> x86_64 GNU/Linux > That sure is Jessie, that's what I first installed for real (not counting > numerous previous tries in Virtual Machines). >> laptop3:~$ >>> palemoon -v >> Moonchild Productions Pale Moon 27.3.0 > I've ran that same version 27.3.0, the repack available from Steven Pusser's > repo, for one month and a half or so, but it failed on me just recently: > Palemoon installation from source > https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=616 > ( how it failed is in the Pale Moon Forums linked there, in the recent posts > of course: > Building Pale Moon on Devuan fails > https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=57&t=15751 > ). > It is currently being built in my Air-Gapped (I'm online only with the clone > of it, ever). > > I pretty strongly believe that it's way, way more privacy friendy than the > intrusive "big" browsers, to cosider only GNU/Linux available: Firefox, Opera, > Chromium. The comparison is like btwn Google and Duckduckgo. > > I analyze the network a lot, still learning, but what I get with my > (primitive) programs: > https://github.com/miroR/tshark-streams and > https://github.com/miroR/tshark-hosts-conv (develop branch recommended there > at this time) > do speak very much in favor of Palemoon (or, it has started as, and still is > mostly used as, a Windows browser, by Mark Straver: Pale Moon). > > I'm engrossed in the compiling, sorry for late reply... > > Regards! > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
