> One rule of thumb I try to follow, to reduce noise, is state a specific > point of contention twice at most, then exit, even if an Inevitable One > insists on rearguing said topic and misrepresenting what you said > (a common ploy to troll another party into continuing) -- evading the > notorious 'dogfight' antipattern that otherwise ensues: > > 61 r + 170830 George Tirebiter (636) ,-> > 62 F 170830 To George Tirebit ( 12) ,-> > 63 r + 170830 George Tirebiter (520) ,-> > 64 F 170830 To George Tirebit ( 16) ,-> > 65 r + 170830 George Tirebiter (230) ,-> > 66 F 170830 To George Tirebit ( 10) ,-> > 67 r + 170830 George Tirebiter (121) ,-> > > The Sad thing is, I sometimes if it is nonsensical, or stupid, I find it highly amusing. In this case though, it was getting old though. ;/
<<attachment: calmstorm.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
