What failed in Debian was the votation count method (1+1+1 < 2)
El 14/10/17 a les 09:19, Edward Bartolo ha escrit: > Although this belongs to devuan-dev I am posting this here for general > discussion. > > I think, the principle should hold indefinitely as anyone working on > Devuan's projects, is doing it for free in their free time. Since > there is no payment involved, it makes a lot of sense to keep some > form of motivator. In this case, such a motivator, would be more say > in decisions. > > Please, understand this email is NOT intended to push myself to have > more say: that would be above my head, as I have absolutely NO > experience besides with the most common equipment found at homes. > > Another point to state is, to repeat that unanimity, is important > where major changes to Devuan are involved. This point has been > criticised as the stalling policy of the EU, but needless to say, > every policy has its downside. It is better to have slow progress > rather than have schisms occurring as a result of deep disagreement. > This has happened to Debian notwithstanding of its well-planned > structure. > > I attribute the changes taking place in GNU/Linux in general, > especially the introduction of systemd, to business forces placing > their fingers where they shouldn't. Devuan should guard itself to > create a structure that impeaches any member that acts in ways that > would undermine the Devuan ideal in the long run. I think, Debian > suffered what it suffered because it allowed members/developers with > questionable backgrounds and design preferences. > > edbarx > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
