On Sat, 4 Nov 2017 at 22:16:53 +0100 Adam Borowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2017 at 05:29:00PM +0000, Simon Hobson wrote: > >> his very rigid attitude to freedom in software > > I'd prefer if this attitude was more rigid. > > For example, AGPL -- even worse as GPL-3 allows an "upgrade" to this > non-free crock. It breaks FSF Freedom 0 "the freedom to use for any > purpose": you can't take any code from an AGPLed project and use it within > any networked scenario that doesn't provide a way to advertise the source, > such as an IMAP server, a wifi-connected lift control Source distribution constraints do not have to do with purpose of use. [...] > GFDL even disallows chmod -r or > locking the door to your server room. A key might be 5000 years old > technology but is still technology. ? What do file permissions, server rooms, doors and locks have to do about documentation and licenses? Alessandro _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
