On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 12:05:31AM +0100, info at smallinnovations dot nl wrote:
[cut] > > It would help if we have a definition of stable. And to attract people for > larger scale testing maybe we should release a "official" beta. > The definition of stable is always the same: "Without known release-critical bugs". Then other distros have their own personal interpretation of "stable", which include stuff that is not even of beta quality, but that's another story. I guess it's better to call something "beta" and then realise that it could have been called "stable", rather than the opposite. HND KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng