On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:42:37 +0200 Jaromil <[email protected]> wrote: > hi Chillfan, > > On Thu, 29 Mar 2018, Chillfan wrote: > > > I agree that a fork is needed, but I think this would be a whole > > lot of work. > > yes. forks are a LOT of work. Even Devuan, which I'd say is a > relatively easy fork, mostly needing work on the infrastructure and > testing and documentation side, was more demanding than expected. > > > If palemoon offered something akin to extended support releases it > > would be a great candidate for that, > > palemoon is stuck at "version 27" series of Firefox and in any case > its in the 2x series I doubt it can be brought up to 50 since the > codebase is rather different. > > said that, I'm happy with palemoon, using always the latest stable > release tagged on the git tree, compiling it myself on Devuan and then > github.com/dyne/tinfoil for sandboxing. here the mozconfig I use, > please note I do not disable pulseaudio or dbus, because that gives > problems, yet I do not use pulseaudio (but I do use dbus...)
Here's why I wouldn't use Palemoon if it were the last browser on earth: https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86 By the way, a little research on USPTO shows they have no registered trademark on "Palemoon". For somebody so lawyerly threatening, he sure hasn't dotted his i's and crossed his t's. SteveT Steve Litt April 2018 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
