On 04/06/2018 at 12:44, KatolaZ wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:55:57AM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 at 11:49:47 +0200 >> KatolaZ <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The most probable outcome is that a new alternative will possibly >>> emerge. And no, gitlab is not the one, IMHO. >> >> Why not? >> >> I do think a more modern solution would be a distributed p2p repository >> based on a keychain, but a classic, centralized repo like GitLab is probably >> much easier to the vast majority of coders (and users, too). Besides the >> fact that there is not one currently available TIKO. >> > > The main limit of Gitlab is the fact that it depends on rails. And > rails is not meant for scalability, IMHO. Whoever has ever run a > Gitlab instance for more than 10 users and 50 repos knows what I am > talking about.
People are soon going to find out: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/technology/gitlab-sees-huge-traffic-spike-after-news-of-microsoft-buying-github/ «GitLab Sees Huge Traffic Spike After News of Microsoft Buying GitHub» Alessandro _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
