Le 16/07/2018 à 15:04, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
I solved this editing
the /etc/roules.d/peresist.rules and use names like nic0, nic1. And I
changed the /etc/networking/interfaces to the new names.
Those files done't seem to exists in my /etc.
But there is a /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
so I'll try editing that.
I got the feeling that those /etc/udev files are ignored nowadays.
Therefore better hack in /lib/udev. But, if you disable interface renaming
in the kernel command arguments, this hack will have no effect.
Editing that file worked, so evidently it wasn't ignored. Is it likely
to be ignored in the future? Is there another mechanism I should be
looking into? Will vdev or eudev (or any other expected *dev) do things
differently?
Means I was wrong (-: I might have been induced in error by the
fact that some rule files exist in /lib/udev and not in /etc/udev, and
ancient versions had all rule files in /etc/udev.
AFAIR, vdev is pretty different; it has config files and shell
scripts, but not the same rule files. eudev should be very similar to
udev since it's a fork.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
