Now isn't it a gift of god that devuan is outside good owns country, is it?
Am Montag, 24. September 2018 schrieb [email protected]: > better to bury a corpse than to let it rot in the air.**** > > This is legally nonsense. The only way I can revoke someone's rights > > to > > It is not nonsense. Gratuitous licenses are and always have been > revocable at the will of the grantor. > > (Yes, I am a lawyer) > > Property law 101. > "But this is COPYRIGHT" > From the US statute: copyright is alienable in the same way property is. > That's where you acquire they ability to license your work in the USA; > congress' copyright act. > Prior to the Statute of Anne there was no copyright what-so-ever. It's a > statutory right. > The statute grants the right to alienate said right(s), and, the > drafters not feeling the need to re-invent the wheel, simply declared > that the operation there-of would be by the established law of property. > > > > In short, "unconditionedwitness", please shut up. You're not helping. > I am informing those who are being threatened with expulsion about their > rights and what steps they can take against their enemies. > Matthew Garret claims your "consent" is immaterial (on the lwn thread). > He is wrong. The contributors must be kept happy. > > You (providing you are the copyright holder to your own code) can revoke > at any time. > There is nothing between you, and putting your detractors to task... > except for your force of will and some paperwork. > > **** > > Moreover, even if I _could_ revoke the license, I wouldn't want to do > > so; it would be ridiculously petty in itself and the precedent it > > would > > set would be destructive to the entire open-source community, about > > which I care deeply. It is _because_ Linux and other open-source > > projects are so important to humanity that I spoke up about what I > > perceive as a threat to it. > > You and others are being threatened with sanction by people such as > Matthew Garret if you do not obey their diktats. > They say essentially: if you want to contribute to opensource (haha 30k > projects have CoCs now!) you will be BARRED from doing so if you do not > obey our religion (anglo-americanism). > > If you're not a feminist: you're sanctioned (punished) > If you're not opposed to men marrying female children (a practice > permitted by YHWH in Devarim chapter 22, vers 28 (na'ar), aswell as by > Sunni Islam), you are punished. > If you are not polite to women you are punished. > If you speak out of turn you are punished. > > Yet they continue to use your code while spitting on you and besmerching > your name. > While making sure you are forgotten if you step out of line. > > (You do the work. They take your work. They try to harm you and reduce > your civil rights. Sound like anything familiar... (c.p.t.l.i.s.m)) > > You must respect women who do NOTHING for you and even NOTHING for > anyone else except exist as a USELESS physical entity (females who are > not sweet young brides for men or mothers and just consume are not > useful for anyone other than themselves: the purpose of females is to > create more human beings and to bring happiness and pleasures to men: > they are superfluous in any other capacity, as a class)... > who rules over you ... > or else you are punished. > > You slaved away writing the code. > When they feel they don't need you anymore they seek to tear you down. > > You have a remedy: Recind the grant. > You did NOT sign away your OWNERSHIP of the code you wrote. > > The anglo-american belief system is that males are to be slaves of women > and their masters. > This belief system is now being imposed on even hobbies like gratis > software development. > They wish to give men no refuge, no place to build something outside the > eye of the middle-class ("white" or english) woman. > To keep men checked and obedient at all time in all things. > > But there is a way to strike back, to strike at the heart. > There is a dagger at the neck of that which you built but is now being > repurposed to bind you. > All you have to do is push. > Such is all any rights-holder has to do. > > Gratuitous licenses are revocable at will. > > > On 2018-09-20 22:57, Edward Cree wrote: > > On 20/09/18 10:27, [email protected] wrote: > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ... _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
