On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 03:20:15AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:10:54 +0100 > Irrwahn <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The part about "acquire, monopolize and decompatablize the tools to > > create initramfs" is ridiculous, > > The preceding half sentence encapsulates the belief difference that > causes our different stances on merging /sbin with anything else. PRF > (Poettering/Redhat/Freedesktop) has developers paid probably in excess > of a million dollars a year to [work on | obfuscate] Linux, whereas > guys like us must undo their obfuscations on our own time, between > bouts of paid work. >
OK, before we continue with a flame about what is wrong and what is right: it seems that the transition to the merged usr is *not* mandatory so far, but it is actually performed at install time. I am currently trying to understand at which point during installation this happens, so that we could just make it optional (i.e, with an opt-in semantics). StayTuned KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
