On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 08:52:26PM +0000, Simon Hobson wrote:
> goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> 
> > Sooooo . . . if the choice to avoid the merge is only available with 
> > debian-installer what does that mean for the live isos?  Will they be 
> > configured with or without the merge as default?
> 
> Does it make any difference at all on a live ISO ? If it's setup merged, then 
> anything referencing /bin (etc) will follow the symlink and access /usr/bin 
> (etc).
> However, as the default for Devuan seems likely to be unmerged, then it would 
> make sense for the live ISOs to be the same. Scripts etc will have to be 
> written to deal with the unmerged (split) layout so nothing should break that 
> way - unless the script is written by someone assuming that nothing in the 
> world runs unsplit any more. Any such scripts will need fixing to run on 
> installed systems anyway, so would then run on a live ISO with split 
> directories.
> 

It does make a difference since we allow to install from the live,
using refractainstaller (not d-i). I guess the ISOs themselves will be
built without a merged usr, and then we will let the user choose if
they want a merged usr in case they decide to install from the live.

KISS

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[     "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[       @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[     @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to