Jim Jackson - 12.12.18, 15:33: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote: > > Quoting Lars Nood??n via Dng ([email protected]): > > > It's probably a time that Procmail be retired, and thus anything > > > based on it. There have been a lot of reports in recent years of > > > serious, unsafe bugs in its processing. However, there is this > > > comment about it from a former Procmail maintainer to consider: > > > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2 > > > > Upon examination, it turns out that the known flaws in Procmail lack > > any credible exploitation scenario. The matter was covered on > > LWN.net a few years ago, and I'm pretty sure nothing has changed > > substantively. > > > > (I've gone through this discussion several times since then on > > mailing lists, and can dredge up details from those if necessary.) > > Just an aside - what are the alternatives to procmail? > so far I've only found _maildrop_ as an in-line delivery filter.
Postfix has built-in minimal lda, but I use "dovecot-lda" as "mailbox_command" in Postfix. I set it up for Sieve support which IMHO is a nice way to speficy rules for IMAP based mail accounts. I still receive a copy of mail via POP3 and let KMail sort it locally. All mail it duplicated to IMAP account and "find -delete" removes older mail. This IMAP account is for accessing via K9-Mail on smartphone. -- Martin _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
