Le 24/04/2019 à 20:43, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:05:12 +0200
Didier Kryn <k...@in2p3.fr> wrote:

Le 24/04/2019 à 01:05, Evilham via Dng a écrit :
Am 24. April 2019 00:24:56 MESZ schrieb Steve Litt

3. Document the misbehaviour when users... Misbehave (okay, that
was a bad joke).
      There's an infinite number of ways a human can misbehave. For
brutal extraction of the media, I don't think it is easy to
characterize.
There's a way. There can be a "superumount" that acquires a root
password and keeps doing umount until it's really unmounted on all
lists like mtab.

    /etc/mtab is userspace only and is optionaly bypassed by mount; it's unreliable. Two pseudofiles are maintained by the kernel: /proc/self/mounts and /proc/self/mountinfo. The last is also the newest and contains more information; this is the one which is checked periodically by hopman. You can perfectly verify this by invoking pmount/pumount from the command-line while looking at hopman's display. The periodicity of these checks is set in the config file; it is 5s by default. Hopman does not rely on its interactions with the user to know the status of the filesystems; instead it reads all it shows from /dev, /sys and /proc. After a mount or umount command has been selected in the menu, then, of course, hopman doesn't wait 5s to check the result, but it shows only what the kernel reports.

    When you select unmount on hopman's menu, hopman invokes pumount, and pumount eventually calls umount(). If some process is accessing the mount point or any file or directory in the directory tree below the mountpoint, umount() returns -1 and sets errno to EBUSY (man 2 umount). At this point, I guess pumount prints strerror(errno) which is equal to "Device or resource busy". Then hopman detects that pumount exited with an eror code and hopman reads the message that pumount has printed on its stderr and shows it in a pop-up window. But hopman does not devise the existence or status of partitions from the result of pumount or any helper command.

    I am surprised that you can select unmount on hopman's menu for a partition on a device which has been removed, because the hotplugger should have deleted the corresponding device file and, therefore, hopman should have removed it immediately from its display. Did you open the menu and then extract the device before clicking the menu entry ?

            Didier


_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to