On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 11:26:12AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi. > > Now that the proof of concept is out, I am thinking about extending it a > little bit.
You use the spellings user-services, userservices, and userservice. Is there actually a difference in meaning between these? Or conventinos that have to be used in different paces? If not, perhaps you should pick one spelling and stick with it. -- hendrik > > - make is a package > - make "install-or-update.sh" into "/usr/bin/userservices" with the > following actions: > - install: Sets up userservices for the user > - update: Updates it > - remove: Removes i > - make "userservice" alias into "/usr/bin/userservice" > - that way the user would not have to setup an alias anymore. > > So with these changes using user services would be like: > > As root: > > apt install user-services > > As user: > > userservices install > > userservice enable redshift > > [x] done :) > > > If user-services packaged gets updated, the user can decide to update > her installation with: > > userservices update > > Ideally it would take into account when the user changed some services. > > > What do you think about that? > > It would be some work, but I for me this sounds like a good idea. > > > In anyway: This is still in proof of concept stage, so I may change > everything :). If you are using this, you are brave alpha tester :) > > Thanks, > -- > Martin > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
