Anno domini 2020 Wed, 29 Jan 12:46:35 -0500
 Steve Litt scripsit:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:58:57 +0000
> Rainer Weikusat via Dng <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Dimitris via Dng <[email protected]> writes:
> > > On 1/28/20 6:46 PM, Rainer Weikusat via Dng wrote:  
> > >> run ntpdate from  
> > >
> > > i've witnessed cases in the past where ntpd wasn't time-syncing
> > > correctly, and ntpdate saved the date/time.
> > > so, IMHO, there's nothing wrong with ntpdate.  
> > 
> > There's nothing wrong with ntpdate provided there's nothing wrong with
> > having the wallclock make arbitrary backwards or forward jumps in
> > unpredictable intervals, IOW, if the only user is a human who doesn't
> > really care, everything's fine.
> 
> Don't all time clients have an option to choose between all at once
> catch-up and slightly redefining a second so the catchup is more slow?
> Maybe ntpdate and that systemd thing also have such an option?

"ntpdate -B" should do it that way.

> 
> SteveT
> 
> Steve Litt 
> January 2020 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
> 



-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to